|
1
|
- Sandra S. Patty
- PPRP - Manager, Transmission Projects
- State Agencies Meeting
- Tawes State Office Building, Annapolis, MD
- April 24, 2008
|
|
2
|
- Pre-application
- Early and often communication encouraged
- Preliminary issues are identified and provided to State Agencies
- This is where we are in the process
- Filed Application
- Coordinated review by the State Agencies
- Results in cohesive, comprehensive State recommended licensing
conditions
- Evidentiary hearing process takes place and public hearings are held
- PSC Responsibilities
- Review the State Agencies’ recommendations
- Issue a final order granting or denying the CPCN
|
|
3
|
- Applies to the construction or modification of an overhead transmission
line (greater than 69,000 volts)
- The application should include:
- A list of each local, state, or federal government agency having
authority to approve or disapprove the construction or operation of the
project and an indication of whether necessary approval has been
obtained
- Information as described by COMAR 20.79.04.01:
- Explanation of the need for the project in meeting demands for
service;
- Description of the effect on system stability and reliability;
- Description of the consequences if delayed or not approved;
- Explanation of the cost effectiveness, including an estimate of
capital cost and annual operating cost; and
- Description of the impact on the economies of the State.
|
|
4
|
- Information as described by COMAR 20.79.04.02
- Engineering and construction features, including:
- Width, length, and total acreage of the right-of-way;
- Line voltage, number of circuits, number of circuits per structure;
- Structure type and dimensions, conductor configuration and size;
- Nominal capacity (MVA), and nominal length of span between structures.
- Property or property right acquired or to be acquired;
- Access roads for construction or maintenance either existing or to be
built;
- Location and identification of the following sites from which the
project would be clearly visible:
- Historical, institutional land, recreational area, esthetic,
archeological, wildlife management areas, and parks or forests;
- Location and identification of all portions of the right-of-way
requiring construction within the 100-year floodplain of any stream;
- Location and identification of any public airport 1 mile or less from
the transmission line; and
- Depiction on suitable topographic map (minimum scale: 1 inch = 2,000
feet).
|
|
5
|
- Alternative transmission line route evaluation as described by COMAR
20.79.04.03
- Estimate of the capital and annual cost of each alternative route, and
- Statement of the reason why each alternative route was rejected
- Environmental information as described by COMAR 20.79.04.04:
- General description of the physical, biological, aesthetic, cultural
features, and conditions of the site and adjacent areas;
- Summary of the environmental and socioeconomic effects of the
construction and operation of the project, including a description of
the unavoidable impacts and recommended mitigation;
- Copy of all studies of the environmental impact of the proposed project
prepared by the applicant; and
- A statement of the ability to conform to the applicable environmental
standards.
- An implementation schedule for the project
|
|
6
|
- CPCN (PSC, MDNR, MDE)
- Required for most overhead transmission > 69-kV
- Air
- Usually incorporated into the CPCN
- Not a significant issue for transmission projects
- Water
- Stormwater permits required for construction
- Tidal and non-tidal wetlands
- MD’s Coastal Zone Management Program
- State-listed fisheries resources and species protection
- Chesapeake Bay Critical Areas Act
- Waste
- Solid waste disposal – construction/demolition debris
- PCB registration – removal/disposal of pre-1980s transformers
- Lands/Buildings
- Rezoning application
- Local building permits – for construction activity
- Highway
- Oversized-equipment deliveries
- New roadway access permit
- Other
- National Historic Preservation Act
- MHT Act
- Utility occupancy of SHA-owned land
- Forest Conservation (MDNR)
- Grading permit
- Sediment and erosion control
|
|
7
|
- Mid-Atlantic Power Pathway (MAPP) – Pepco Holdings, Inc.
- Potomac-Appalachian Transmission Highline (PATH) – Allegheny/AEP Joint
Venture
- Other Transmission Projects
- Urbana Electric Capacity Upgrade – Allegheny
- Raphael Road to Bagley Rebuild – BGE
- Holland Cliffs to Helen Creek Rebuild – SMECO
|
|
8
|
- 500-kV line extending 230 miles through VA, MD, DE, and NJ
- 177 miles planned on or near existing ROW
- Entire portion through Southern MD on existing ROW
- PHI will obtain new ROW in Dorchester Co. (200 ft.)
- Water crossings planned:
- Potomac, Patuxent, and Nanticoke Rivers
- Chesapeake Bay (approx. 8 miles from Calvert Cliffs to Dorchester Co.)
- Affected counties in MD:
- Charles, Calvert, Prince George’s, Dorchester, and Wicomico
- Two 230-kV lines also planned (in Dorchester and Wicomico Co.)
- To address local reliability issues; not yet approved by PJM
- Schedule:
- PHI may file application in phases with Southern MD portion filed
during the last quarter of 2008; Eastern Shore portion by 2nd
quarter of 2009
- First segment (Possum Point to Calvert Cliffs) to be completed by 2011
- Calvert Cliffs to Indian River completed by 2012
- Last segment (Indian River to Salem) finished by 2013
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
- 244 miles of 765-kV line from the John Amos to Bedington substations
(WV)
- 46 miles of twin-circuit 500-kV line from Bedington to a proposed
substation near Kemptown, MD (southeast of Frederick)
- No routing details have been provided by Allegheny thus far
- Affected counties in MD:
- Washington and Frederick
- Possibly Montgomery and Carroll, depending on final location of the
substation near Kemptown
- Schedule:
- Application expected to be filed by December 1, 2008
- June of 2012 target date for completion of this project
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
- Urbana Electricity Upgrade (Allegheny Power)
- Located in Urbana, MD (near Frederick)
- Proposed project filed in 2004; PSC denied CPCN request in 2005 with
order instructing Allegheny to begin immediate development of an energy
solution for Urbana
- With the assistance of a small group of stakeholders, the goal is to
have a proposed solution by summer 2008
|
|
25
|
- Raphael Road to Bagley Rebuild (BGE)
- Upgrade of 6 miles of transmission facilities from Raphael Road
substation to proposed Bagley substation (northeast of Baltimore)
- Single-circuit 230-kV line upgraded to double-circuit 230-kV
- Occurs within existing ROW; however, passes through Gunpowder Falls
State Park
- Application to be filed during mid-2008
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
- Holland Cliffs to Helen Creek Rebuild (SMECO)
- Upgrade 69-kV line from Holland Cliffs to proposed Helen Creek
substation to 230-kV
- Project occurs within existing ROW
- Designed to create a continuous “loop” of electricity service around
SMECO’s service area
- Application to be filed late October/early November 2008
|
|
28
|
|